You raise some good points, Elder. I think I have some pretty good answers, but I am also open to hearing different solutions to some of the issues we have dealt with in the current and previous locations.
Elder Vermilion wrote:
I just don't understand how moving 2 blocks from the old location that wasn't conducive to growth, is conducive to growth.
Compared to the old location, we are looking at double the parking, 100% less cricket matches, playground equipment for the kiddoes, and plumbed restrooms.
Quote:
We are still going to be drawing from the old demographic, still directly competing with AP for members, etc.
The issue of competition with AP remains, and probably will remain, unless MS ceases to be a north/NE group. To address that issue, which we will have to if we do anything other than close shop, I have been communicating with Aria and Sutra. We will be coordinating our recruitment strategies, with the idea that new recruits will decide for themselves as far as Saturday v. Sunday and geography. There isn't an easy answer to the recruitment of older, previously active members. However, I think that is balanced by the possibility that if both groups thrive, we may have more players visiting other parks on opposite days.
As far as demographics go, I am adopting a whole new playbook. If we end up settling at this location, I am going to try to create a park from a demographic that spans not only Garland but into Mesquite and east Dallas. The name of the game will be recruiting: new players, young players, people not entrenched in existing dynamics.
Keep in mind also that the further north we move, the more we are competing with existing HFS groups, including some with former Amtgard members. One of our new recruits, as you will recall, is an HFS player who plays Sundays at one of the Richardson parks we scouted.